Witness Reports Bright Light Near U.S. Test Facility
The light stayed fixed. A man in another car tried to see it but couldn’t.
The light stayed fixed. A man in another car tried to see it but couldn’t.
A man told the FBI he saw a bright light near a test facility. It stayed fixed, but a man in another car couldn’t see it.
Heavily redacted FBI FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) memorializing a September 2023 interview (conducted via FaceTime Video) of a witness, a contractor with 10-15 hours as a drone pilot, who described a daytime UAP sighting at a US test site while traveling to conduct LiDAR tests. The witness reported a linear, metallic/gray object with an extremely bright white light on its east side, smaller than a 737 but larger than a drone (1-2 Blackhawk-helicopter lengths), at approximately 5,000 ft AGL, traveling east-to-west parallel to the ground for 5-10 seconds before the light went out and the object vanished. The interview also recounts the witness's psychological aftereffects (storm-night TV concerns, weird dreams, sleep disturbance for two nights). Names, locations, dates within the month, and most identifying details are redacted.
Around 0730, while traveling south in a convoy of three vehicles to a gate (which was giving trouble) en route to LiDAR tests, the witness observed a linear object with an extremely bright white light on its east side, located about three-quarters of the way up the windshield. The object was metallic/gray, lacked wings or exhaust, and was smaller than a 737 but 1-2 Blackhawk helicopters in length and definitely bigger than a drone. It was at approximately 5,000 ft AGL, moving east-to-west parallel to the ground. After 5-10 seconds the light went out and the object vanished; the witness could not reacquire it in the otherwise clear sky. The object remained the same size and light intensity throughout. No vehicle interference was noticed. A person in the second vehicle tried unsuccessfully to direct another person's attention to the object.
"At about three quarters of the windshield up, [REDACTED] saw a linear object with a super bright light on the east side of the object."
Why it matters: Primary description of the object's apparent position and lighting
Page 1
"The light was bright white and bright enough to see bands within the light."
Why it matters: Unusual detail of internal banding within the light source
Page 1
"The object was metallic / gray in color. It did not have any wings or exhaust."
Why it matters: Standard UAP morphology details
Page 1
"The object was smaller than a 737, one to two Blackhawk helicopters in length and was definitely bigger than a drone."
Why it matters: Size comparators given by witness
Page 1
"The object was approximately 5000 feet above ground level, and moved east to west parallel to the ground."
Why it matters: Estimated altitude and trajectory
Page 1
"The object was visible for five to ten seconds and then the light went out and the object vanished."
Why it matters: Disappearance with extinguishing of light
Page 1
"The object stayed the same size and kept the same light intensity during the time [REDACTED] observed it."
Why it matters: No apparent change in apparent size suggests roughly constant range or perpendicular geometry
Page 2
"[REDACTED] did not notice any interference with their vehicles."
[REDACTED witness/interviewee]
contractor; drone pilot (10-15 hours) · Page 1
[REDACTED FBI special agent]
interviewing agent · FBI · Page 1
[REDACTED additional interviewer/observer]
sat in on interview · Page 1
[REDACTED driver]
driver of first vehicle · Page 1
[REDACTED passenger]
passenger in first vehicle (with witness) · Page 1
[REDACTED person in second vehicle]
tried to get another person to see the object · Page 2
[REDACTED US test site], United States
Page 1
LiDAR (test equipment)
sensor · Page 1
drone (planned for tests)
aircraft · Page 1
Boeing 737 (size comparator)
aircraft · Page 1
UH-60 Blackhawk (size comparator)
aircraft · Page 1
Header/file marking line near top of page ('S22 Orricia, Recorp' OCR garble around redaction)
Likely reason: FBI file/case identifier
Date of entry value adjacent to '10 A /2023'
Likely reason: Specific day of FD-302 entry
Specific September 2023 date of interview/sighting
Likely reason: Personally identifying / case-specific date
Names of interviewing FBI special agent and additional interviewer/observer
Likely reason: Privacy of FBI personnel (per FOIA b6/b7C)
Name and identifying information of interviewee
Likely reason: Privacy of private US person (b6/b7C)
Location where interviewee was during the interview
Likely reason: Personally identifying location
Employer/contracting entity of interviewee ('was a [REDACTED] and had ten to fifteen hours as a drone pilot')
Likely reason: Employer/affiliation information
Names of three other contractors and additional person at the test site
Likely reason: Third-party privacy
Test site / facility name where LiDAR testing was to occur
FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10), 2 pages, FBI; interview conducted via FaceTime Video; interview date and drafted date both redacted but appear to be within September-October 2023. Document is one of a tightly-coupled cluster of FBI FD-302s (companions: slug 158 'serial 5' and slug 159 'serial 3') documenting multi-witness accounts of the same September 2023 daytime UAP at a US test site during LiDAR drone tests. Note manifest title for this slug reads 'FBI September 2023 Sighting - Serial 5' with pdf_pairing 'Serial 5 Redacted_Redacted', while filename/slug indicates 'serial-4'; user task framing treats this record as serial 4 with companions 158 (serial 5) and 159 (serial 3). Object size estimates (smaller than 737, 1-2 Blackhawk lengths) and altitude (~5,000 ft AGL) are first-person witness estimates, not instrumented measurements. OCR garble in header ('S22 Orricia, Recorp') likely corresponds to standard FBI form/markings.
In September 2023, near a test facility in the United States.
No. The record describes a bright light above the horizon but does not identify it.
That is not known. The television went off during a storm, and the record does not establish a connection to the light.
Why it matters: Negative finding on EM/vehicle effects
Page 2
"[REDACTED] was annoyed when she first saw the object because the air space had been restricted for the drone tests they were going to conduct."
Why it matters: Implies airspace was restricted/controlled at time of sighting
Page 2
"That night a storm came through and the TV went out in [REDACTED] hotel room. He was still freaked out and went downstairs to make sure all the TVs were out in the hotel and not just his."
Why it matters: Witness psychological aftereffect
Page 2
"[REDACTED] had weird dreams and had trouble sleeping for the first two nights after he saw the object."
Why it matters: Reported sleep/dream effects following the sighting
Page 2
Likely reason: Sensitive government/test facility location
Item or briefing the group received ('After receiving a [REDACTED]')
Likely reason: Possibly sensitive operational detail
Name of vehicle 1 driver and the witness's role as passenger
Likely reason: Third-party privacy
City/state line in 'Investigation on 09/2023 at [REDACTED] United States'
Likely reason: Specific location of investigation/interview
File number on FD-302 form ('File# [REDACTED]')
Likely reason: FBI case file number
Date dictated/transcribed ('Date drafted 10/2023')
Likely reason: Specific date
Drafting agent's name ('by [REDACTED]')
Likely reason: Privacy of FBI personnel
Subject pronouns and names throughout continuation page
Likely reason: Third-party privacy of witness and others
Continuation header field values: '/Continuation of FD-302 of [REDACTED] September [REDACTED] 2023 [REDACTED] UAP [REDACTED], On 09/[REDACTED]/2023'
Likely reason: Specific dates and case identifiers
Names of person in second vehicle and the person they tried to alert
Likely reason: Third-party privacy
Hotel/lodging identifier
Likely reason: Personally identifying location
In September 2023, a man driving through the gate of a U.S. test facility saw a bright light above the horizon. He hadn’t seen it earlier, near a small bridge; he noticed it only after passing through the gate.
That’s what the witness told the FBI. The light did not change while he watched it, and a man in another car couldn’t see it. Afterward, the witness had trouble sleeping for two nights. What had he seen, and why did it stay on his mind? Those are the details at the heart of his account.
The light appeared near a U.S. test facility. At the time, airspace in the area was restricted ahead of drone tests planned at the site. The witness was irritated by the light, given the restrictions.
He described a bright light above the horizon. While they watched it, its size and brightness remained constant. The witness noticed no interference with the vehicles. A man in the other car tried to see the light but couldn’t. The two people traveling through the area, then, did not see the same thing.
A storm passed through that night, and the television in the witness’s hotel room went off. Upset, he went to check whether the other televisions in the hotel had also gone off. The record does not say what he found.
After seeing the light, the witness had strange dreams and struggled to sleep during the first two nights. The record does not describe the dreams. It includes the hotel incident and his trouble sleeping as part of his account, without claiming that the light caused the television to go off or the dreams to occur.
The light’s shape, source, and identity are unknown. The record does not explain why one man saw it and another did not, or whether the light had anything to do with the television malfunction.
The light stayed fixed beyond the gate, but no one in the account could say exactly what had passed above the horizon.