Military Pilot Lost Track of a Flying Object Behind a Cloud
When the object reappeared, two more emerged to its east.
When the object reappeared, two more emerged to its east.
A military pilot lost a small object behind a cloud. When he resumed tracking it, he noticed two additional objects to its east.
U.S. Navy Range Fouler Debrief Form documenting an 08/24/20 nighttime observation of three unidentified small air contacts over the North Arabian Sea during routine operations. The reporter, an O-3 pilot from HSM-73 flying side number 705 (Buno 168122), tracked one contact before it was obscured by a cloud, then regained contact and saw two additional unknown air contacts due east of the initial one. All three contacts appeared to maintain relative course, speed, and altitude on an apparently westerly heading. There was no ES, radar track, or IFF track on the contacts; distance and speed were unknown.
During routine operations at night (00:04:30Z), the reporter observed three possible unidentified small air contacts. Initially observed one unknown air contact and tracked it before losing sight when it went behind a cloud. When contact was regained, two additional unknown air contacts were seen due east of the location of the initial contact. All three appeared to maintain their relative course, speed, and altitude. Negative ES, radar track, and IFF track. Distance and speed of contact were unknown; precise course unknown but appeared to be on a westerly heading. No interaction took place. Mission described as SSC; not an LFE. Number of contacts in 'Group': 3. Stable trackfile: No. Tally Achieved: not checked. Wind 310 at 5; reported altitude field shows '21440' with apparent reference to 22000.
"observed 3x possible unidentified small air contact[s] while conducting routine operations in the North Arabian Sea. Negative ES, radar track, and IFF track. Distance to contact was unknown. Speed of contact was unknown. Precise course of contact was unknown, but appeared to be on a westerly heading."
Why it matters: Core narrative: three small unidentified contacts with no electronic signature returns.
Page 1
"Initially observed 1x unknown air contact and tracked it before losing sight as it went behind a cloud. When contact on the unknown air contact was regained, 2x additional unknown air contacts were seen due east of the location of the initial contact. All 3x unknown air contacts appeared to maintain their relative course, speed, and altitude."
Why it matters: Two additional contacts appeared after the first was momentarily occluded by a cloud, then all three held a coordinated relative formation.
Page 1
North Arabian Sea
Page 1
HSM-73
U.S. Navy · Page 1
Side No. 705 / Buno 168122
aircraft · Page 1
Last Name, First Name / S/PR Email Address fields; aircrew identifying information
Likely reason: PII protection (b)(6) / SPEAR sanitization policy
Narrative includes blanked spans marked '1.4a' interrupting the description of the platform/observer and contacts
Likely reason: Classification exemption 1.4(a) (military plans, weapons systems, or operations)
Submission instructions email addresses and troubleshooting phone redacted as (b)(6)
Likely reason: PII protection (b)(6)
Source is a single-page Range Fouler Debrief Form with extensive form-field OCR. Bears markings 'USCENTCOM MOR 26-0038 to 26-0046' and 'Approved for Release to MR9' dated 03/27/26. Squadron HSM-73 is an MH-60R Seahawk squadron, but the document does not state the airframe explicitly, so platform is recorded only as side number 705 / Buno 168122 per the form. Time 00:04:30Z on 08/24/20. Working area listed as 21440 (also entered for Contact Latitude field — likely a form-fill artifact); altitude reference '22000' present but exact contact altitude not stated. Wind 310/5. Mission: SSC, not LFE. Crew Position: Pilot, Rank O-3.
A US Navy debriefing form, intended to document incidents during operations or training.
The document was released to the public in 2026.
No. The report does not identify them and offers no conventional explanation.
A military pilot was flying over the northern Arabian Sea during a routine operation. He spotted a small object in the sky, which appeared to have a wing-like structure, and tracked it. Then the object passed behind a cloud and disappeared from his sight.
When the pilot saw it again, two additional objects appeared to the east of where he had first observed the initial one. Three objects were now visible in the sky, and they seemed to be moving together. This description appears in a US Navy report form, intended for documenting incidents during operations or training. The report was released to the public in 2026.
The pilot initially described a single object, which he managed to track. He lost it behind the cloud, then resumed tracking. At that point, he noticed two additional objects to the east of where he had first seen the initial one at the start of the sighting.
The report does not state what the two additional objects looked like, nor does it mention if they resembled the first object. The striking detail is the sequence: one object disappeared, and when the pilot saw it again, two more were there.
Subsequently, the three objects appeared to maintain the same direction, speed, and altitude. That is, according to the pilot's impression, they continued to move in a similar fashion relative to each other.
The report does not describe any contact or communication between the pilot and the objects, nor does it provide measurements of their distance or speed. The pilot was unable to determine these details during the sighting. Therefore, the description cannot tell us how close the objects were, or how fast they were moving.
The report does not identify the objects or offer a conventional explanation for their appearance. It also clarifies that the description reflects the pilot's impression at the time of the incident, rather than a definitive determination of the objects' characteristics.
One cloud concealed an object in the sky. When it reappeared, it was no longer alone.