Military Operator Saw Three Objects Moving on Screen
He was tracking the first, then a second object zipped past it.
He was tracking the first, then a second object zipped past it.
A military crew member reported that a second object, similar to the first but faster, passed it. Later, three objects were seen moving together on the screen, but their identity remains unknown.
A single-page U.S. Navy Range Fouler Debrief Form documenting an 08/31/2020 dusk encounter reported by an O-2 pilot of squadron VFA-82ATKS (as transcribed). The pilot describes initially tracking one object that flies through the sensor screen, then being surpassed by a second object of the same size and shape at much higher speed, with up to three objects on screen simultaneously moving amongst each other. The form records contact altitude 18000 (units not specified on form), wind 150/230, and an MGRS grid for the initial contact (partially redacted). Latitude/longitude, identifying personnel information, and certain handling instructions are redacted.
At dusk on 08/31/20, the pilot saw an initial object fly through the sensor screen and began tracking it. A second object of the same size and shape but at much higher speed surpassed the first. At one point during tracking, three objects were on the screen simultaneously moving amongst each other. Contact altitude is recorded as 18000. Wind direction/speed at contact altitude is given as 150/230. Altitude was not constant; the contact was moving.
"Saw the initial object fly through the screen and started tracking i[t]. Initial object was surpassed by another object of same size and shape but much higher speed. At one p[o]int during tracking the objects, there were three on the screen at the same time moving amongst each other."
Speaker: Reporting pilot
Why it matters: Core narrative: multiple same-shape objects, at least one with much higher speed than another, three simultaneously on screen.
Page 1
"MGRS Grid of initial contact: 39RWL2[redacted]"
Why it matters: Initial-contact location given as MGRS, with the precise grid digits redacted; the 39R zone places this in the Japan / East Asia region, consistent with the document title.
Page 1
"This information is for contact only. SPEAR sanitizes all r[e]ports of identifying information. Absolutely no identifying information for aircrew or squadr[o]n will be recorded for analysis."
Why it matters: Establishes the SPEAR program's handling protocol for Range Fouler reports.
Page 1
[redacted]
Pilot · U.S. Navy aviator, rank O-2 · Page 1
MGRS grid 39RWL2[redacted] (initial contact), Japan
Page 1
VFA-82ATKS (as transcribed: 'j482ATKS')
U.S. Navy · Page 1
Radar (type listed as 'Other')
radar · Page 1
AIM-9X (self-track field on form)
sensor · Page 1
ATFLIR (autotrack field on form)
sensor · Page 1
Last Name, First Name field
Likely reason: Personnel privacy (b)(6)
Email Address field
Likely reason: Personnel privacy (b)(6)
Contact Working Area (e.g., 'W-72 1A')
Likely reason: National security exemption marked '(b)(1)'
Contact Latitude (DD:MM:SS)
Likely reason: National security / location withheld
Contact Longitude (DD:MM:SS)
Likely reason: National security / location withheld
Side No. / Buno
Likely reason: Aircraft identification withheld
MGRS grid trailing digits after '39RWL2'
Likely reason: Precise location withheld
Submission email and troubleshooting phone number ('3.5c, (b)(6)')
Likely reason: FOIA exemption 3.5c and (b)(6) personnel privacy
Repository link for display tape uploads ('3.5c. (b)(6)')
Likely reason: FOIA exemption 3.5c and (b)(6)
Single-page form with heavy OCR noise (mojibake from form field glyphs); transcriptions of squadron designator and some checkbox states are best-effort. Form fields show: Rank O-2; Squadron rendered as 'j482ATKS' (likely VFA-82 ATKS or similar); Crew Position Pilot; Date 08/31/20; Day/Night = Dusk; Mission Description = ISR; LFE? = No; Stable Trackfile = No (checkbox section ambiguous in OCR); Tally Achieved = No (ambiguous); Contact Altitude 18000; Altitude Constant = No; Was the contact moving = Yes; Wind 150/230; Shape = Other; Apparent Propulsion checked. Manifest's incident_location ('Arabian Gulf') conflicts with the document title indicating Japan and the MGRS 39R zone — flag for cross-record review.
He reported a first object, a second object that passed it, and later three objects moving together.
The report does not specify how long it lasted.
No. The document records the crew member's impression but does not identify them.
An American military crew member was monitoring a screen during operations in the Arabian Gulf region. Suddenly, an object appeared on it, and he began to track it. Subsequently, another, faster object appeared, and then three objects were seen together.
The report describes unusual movement on the screen but does not explain what was displayed. Therefore, it's impossible to know exactly what the crew member saw. This brief sequence is precisely the core of the story: a first object, a second object passing it, and three moving together.
The incident occurred in August 2020. The crew member, whose exact role is not detailed, wrote that he saw the first object moving across the screen and began to track it. Afterward, a second object passed the first.
According to the description, both objects were the same size and shape. The second object moved at a greater speed. The report does not include a speed measurement, nor does it detail how the size or shape was determined. These are the things the crew member described at the time of the incident, not separately verified data.
At some point, during the tracking, three objects appeared on the screen simultaneously. The description states that they moved around each other. It does not detail the trajectory of their movement, making it impossible to know exactly how they moved relative to one another.
This is how the crew member described the event on a US Navy form. This form is used by crew members to document what they observed during military operations or training, including when something enters a restricted airspace. Here, the form provides some details about the sequence but does not describe what happened after the three were seen together.
It is unknown what the objects were, what the screen displayed, or how long the display lasted. The document emphasizes that the description reflects the reporter's impression at the time of the event and does not determine the objects' characteristics; it also does not offer a conventional explanation.
Three objects moved on one screen. What exactly the crew member saw remains an open question.