NASA Investigated Lights Seen by Two Astronauts in Space
John Glenn and Walter Schirra reported seeing lights during spaceflight. NASA interviewed them to find out what they saw.
John Glenn and Walter Schirra reported seeing lights during spaceflight. NASA interviewed them to find out what they saw.
John Glenn and Walter Schirra reported luminous phenomena during spaceflights. NASA interviewed them, but the summary does not specify what they saw or what caused the lights.
A compiled NASA file of scientific debriefing transcripts, memoranda, correspondence and analysis from Project Mercury (1962-1963) concerning visual phenomena reported by astronauts. It centers on the luminous 'firefly'/'snowflake' particles seen by John Glenn (MA-6) and Scott Carpenter (MA-7) at sunrise, and on a luminous band/airglow layer seen above the horizon, with debriefings also covering Walter Schirra (MA-8) and Gordon Cooper (MA-9). Internal memos and a Los Alamos letter document NASA's scientific effort to characterize the particles and the airglow layer; the documents conclude the particles originated from the spacecraft itself (Carpenter demonstrated this by striking the capsule wall to release them), not from extraterrestrial sources.
During MA-6, at first sunrise on each of three orbits, John Glenn observed thousands of small luminous particles outside the capsule window, firefly-like, steady, yellow-green/green-yellow in color, roughly 6-10 feet apart and from very small up to about 3/8-1/2 inch, drifting at an estimated 3-5 mph differential. He initially wondered if they were Air Force chaff/needles or frozen water from the capsule. They appeared only at the first light of sunrise and faded as the sun rose.
During MA-7, Scott Carpenter observed and photographed the same 'Glenn effect' particles (white, snowflake-like, 1 mm to 1 cm, some brighter than the moon), seen not only at sunrise but at many times after sunrise, indicating they were not tied to sunrise itself. Shortly before reentry he struck the capsule wall by hand, which promptly liberated large numbers of particles, demonstrating they emanated from the capsule.
Glenn reported a luminous band/haze layer roughly 7-8 degrees above the night horizon. Carpenter (MA-7) used a 5577-Angstrom airglow filter (supplied by Dunkelman) to identify the band as the 5577 airglow layer, with timed observations placing its densest part near 89 km altitude. A discrepancy was noted between eye estimates of 8-10 degrees angular height and timed observations of 2-3 degrees, attributed to a horizon-magnification illusion.
Gordon Cooper (MA-9) debriefed on the flashing-light beacon experiment: a beacon was ejected and Cooper estimated its distance, seeing a steady glow up to about his orbital-path level on a later night pass and reporting a solid thump as it departed the spacecraft.
"From these considerations alone, it may be stated that the luminous particles observed by Col. Glenn were not extraterrestrial particles but were particles associated with the spacecraft or the launching of the booster."
Speaker: NASA memorandum to Director, Office of Space Sciences
Why it matters: Explicit early NASA conclusion that the famous 'fireflies' were not of extraterrestrial origin.
Page 34
"Shortly before reentry, just at sunrise, Carpenter performed the decisive experiment of hitting the capsule walls with his hand. The blows promptly resulted in the liberation of large numbers of particles. It is thus clear that at least those particles observed in the MA-6 flight emanated from the capsule."
Speaker: Draft note on the scientific observations
Why it matters: Describes the in-flight experiment that physically demonstrated the particles came from the capsule.
Page 60
"They were at least as bright as the brightest fireflies you've ever seen in a situation like that and the light was very steady and they were about the same color as fireflies. This was a luminous yellow-green or green-yellow color."
Speaker: John H. Glenn
Why it matters: Glenn's own first-impression description of the 'firefly' particles.
Page 21
"He also saw these objects 7 minutes after the first sunrise and again 43 minutes after sunrise... It is thus quite clear that they are not related to sunrise, except perhaps in the sense of being most easily visible then."
Speaker: Draft note on the scientific observations
Why it matters: Corrects the early assumption that the particles were a sunrise-only phenomenon.
Page 60
John H. Glenn
Astronaut, MA-6 (Friendship 7); observer of luminous particles and twilight band · NASA / U.S. Marine Corps · Page 34
M. Scott Carpenter
Astronaut, MA-7 (Aurora 7); photographed particles and performed capsule-wall experiment · NASA / U.S. Navy · Page 57
Walter M. Schirra
Astronaut, MA-8 (Sigma 7); debriefed on star/cloud/airglow observations · NASA / U.S. Navy · Page 160
Gordon Cooper
Astronaut, MA-9 (Faith 7); flashing-light beacon experiment debriefing · NASA / U.S. Air Force · Page 64
Dr. Jocelyn Gill
NASA astronomer; recipient of Los Alamos letter and debriefing participant · NASA Headquarters, Office of Space Sciences · Page 40
Maurice Dubin
Head, Aeronomy Program; authored memo requesting detailed description of Glenn's observations · NASA Office of Space Sciences, Geophysics & Astronomy Programs · Page 52
Bob E. Watt
Author of analysis proposing NO2 absorbing-layer hypothesis for Glenn's high layer · Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Assoc. J-Division Leader · Page 50
J. A. O'Keefe
Theoretical analysis of particles and refraction; debriefing participant · Theoretical Division, Goddard Space Flight Center · Page 50
Dr. Nancy Roman
NASA astronomer; questioner in Glenn debriefing · NASA · Page 9
Lawrence Dunkelman
Supplied airglow filter used by Carpenter; debriefing participant · Goddard Space Flight Center · Page 57
Eugene Shoemaker
Debriefing participant (geology questions) · USGS / NASA · Page 162
Frank M. Crichton
Compound file: includes (1) Glenn MA-6 scientific debriefing transcript, (2) a memo to Director, Office of Space Sciences assessing Glenn's observations, (3) Maurice Dubin memos (21 Feb 1962) requesting detailed descriptions, (4) a July 1962 Los Alamos letter from Bob E. Watt to Dr. Jocelyn Gill proposing an NO2 absorbing-layer hypothesis with mathematical analysis, (5) a draft note analyzing Carpenter's MA-7 airglow and particle observations, (6) a 1 June 1963 scientific debriefing (Cooper flashing-light experiment), and (7) a lengthy Schirra MA-8 debriefing transcript, plus a press clipping. The historically famous 'fireflies' mystery is resolved within these documents as capsule-origin particles (likely life-support steam condensing into snowflakes plus dust/insulation). Manifest notes pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 as relevant to the PURSUE initiative. OCR quality varies; quotes drawn from the cleaner typed pages.
The summary says they saw luminous phenomena but doesn’t describe what they looked like.
The collection mentions luminous particles and small grains from space entering the atmosphere. The summary doesn’t conclude that they caused the lights.
NASA capsule inspector; tested whether dye marker/shark repellant could escape in vacuum · NASA · Page 60
John Winckler
Proposed astronauts might observe Cherenkov radiation flashes with eyes closed · University of Minnesota · Page 20
William Douglas
Astronauts' physician; cited re Glenn turning spacecraft to inspect particles · NASA · Page 201
Gherman Titov
Soviet cosmonaut cited as having reported a similar high-angle haze layer · USSR · Page 36
Friendship 7 (Mercury-Atlas 6 / MA-6)
spacecraft · Page 34
Aurora 7 (Mercury-Atlas 7 / MA-7)
spacecraft · Page 57
Sigma 7 (Mercury-Atlas 8 / MA-8)
spacecraft · Page 160
Faith 7 (Mercury-Atlas 9 / MA-9)
spacecraft · Page 64
TIROS meteorological satellite
satellite · Page 176
John Glenn and Walter Schirra saw luminous phenomena during spaceflights. NASA interviewed both astronauts to find out what the lights were.
The reports drew scientific interest, and the collection includes transcripts of interviews and debriefings with Glenn and Schirra. But the documents mentioned in the summary don’t describe what the lights looked like or explain what caused them.
The record covers materials from 1962–1963 related to scientific interest in the luminous phenomena the two men reported. NASA spoke with each astronaut about what he observed during spaceflight, seeking to establish the nature of the phenomena.
The interviews and debriefings show that the reports were examined. But the summary doesn’t include the astronauts’ own words. It doesn’t specify exactly what they saw, how long the sighting lasted, or whether they both saw the same thing. So the summary doesn’t tell us whether they described points of light, flashes, or something else.
The materials also include brief descriptions of luminous particles, along with details about scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena and experiences aboard spacecraft. These subjects appear in the same collection, but the summary doesn’t say they explain Glenn and Schirra’s reports.
Some of the materials concern small grains from space entering the atmosphere. They’re mentioned alongside other phenomena, but the summary doesn’t link them to the lights the astronauts saw. Nor does it detail any particular explanation that was tested and found to fit.
It’s not known exactly what Glenn and Schirra saw or what caused the luminous phenomena. The summary mentions luminous particles and grains from space, but doesn’t conclude that they explain the reports.
Two astronauts saw something in space. What it was remains unknown.