McDivitt Couldn’t Tell Whether the Guidance Instrument Was Right
For most of the flight, he didn’t know if he could trust it. On the third day, he found a way to check.
For most of the flight, he didn’t know if he could trust it. On the third day, he found a way to check.
McDivitt couldn’t verify the accuracy of Gemini 4’s guidance instrument. On the third day, he compared its reading with what he saw outside the window, and the two matched.
This is Part II of the preliminary transcript of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing of astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White, made from voice tape recordings taken aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp on June 9, 1965 and concluded at the Manned Spacecraft Center on June 12, 1965. Prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch (June 18, 1965) and originally classified CONFIDENTIAL, it covers spacecraft systems operation, operational checks, the Visual Sightings section, experiments, pre-mission planning, mission control, and training. The crew describe celestial and atmospheric observations including a recurring nighttime 'curtain' of parallel light rays seen near Australia, continual 'firefly'/particle effects around the spacecraft, airglow and horizon banding, and observations during separation and reentry.
On two separate nighttime passes both astronauts observed a phenomenon of parallel running lines of light radiating up from the Earth toward the spacecraft, resembling a curtain or the Aurora Borealis except originating below them. The first instance was brighter and 'wiggly' with five or six curves; the lights appeared to be in motion, wiggling back and forth like neon signs. The crew judged it was not in the airglow layer, appeared closer than the horizon (about halfway between the spacecraft and horizon), and seemed to rise out of clouds to perhaps half their altitude (~50-60 miles). McDivitt attempted photographs (noting a likely wrong camera setting on the first try).
Continual 'fireflies'/particles around the spacecraft, best seen at sunrise and sunset against the black sky. The crew attributed most to reflecting particles such as booster fuel particles and urine-dump droplets catching the sun, which they said looked like an unreal star field and were filmed.
McDivitt notes under Miscellaneous external observations that he observed three satellites, stating these were covered in detail earlier in the debriefing (Part I) and not repeated here.
"They were just parallel running lines of lights radiating from the earth up toward us but at a distance away, and it sort of looked like a curtain. All of these lights rays seemed to be sort of parallel to each other. They looked a lot like the Aurora Borealis, except that they were down below us and they were coming up toward us."
Speaker: McDivitt
Why it matters: Primary description of the recurring nighttime light-curtain phenomenon both crew members observed
Page 209
"Yes, I saw it too, so you weren't seeing things."
Speaker: White
Why it matters: Independent corroboration by the second crew member of the light phenomenon
Page 209
"This thing was in motion, too. It wasn't a stationary thing. It continued to move the way the lights on neon signs do. It was wiggling back and forth."
Speaker: McDivitt
Why it matters: Describes the dynamic, moving character of the observed phenomenon
Page 210
"In the external observations I did observe three satellites, but I think that these were covered in detail earlier, and I don't believe we need to go over that again here."
Speaker: McDivitt
Why it matters: Indicates the crew's external object sightings (satellites) were detailed in Part I of the debriefing
Page 241
James McDivitt
Command Pilot · NASA
Edward White
Pilot · NASA
John Young
Astronaut who briefed McDivitt on adapter separation appearance · NASA
Joe Schmitt
Suit technician who adjusted White's helmet cables · NASA
John Glenn
Referenced for prior reentry experience · NASA
North Atlantic Ocean, United States
Australia
South Atlantic Anomaly
Florida, United States
Gulf Coast, United States
USS Wasp
U.S. Navy
Gemini 4 (GT-4) spacecraft
spacecraft
USS Wasp
ship
Originally classified CONFIDENTIAL (Group 4), with Espionage Act and FOIA-exemption notices on the cover; manifest shows no redaction flag and no blacked-out content is visible, only classification header stamps. The document text supplied to this analysis is partial: pages corresponding to printed transcript pages ~81-205 were truncated, so the opening of the Visual Sightings section (Countdown, Powered Flight, and the start of Orbital Flight, printed pages 188-205) was not available; findings here are drawn from the surviving Visual Sightings pages (~206-224), the front matter, and the experiments/planning/training sections. Most dramatic UAP-relevant content (the light-ray 'curtain') and the three-satellites reference appear within or are cross-referenced from this debriefing. Incident date approximated to June 1965 (mission flew June 3-7, 1965; debriefing June 9-12, 1965); specific phenomenon dates were said by the crew to be recoverable from the voice tape.
It helps the crew determine which way the spacecraft is pointing.
The passage doesn’t specify. It says the instrument’s reading matched what they saw.
On the third day of the Gemini 4 mission, Jim McDivitt switched on the spacecraft’s guidance instrument. He compared its reading with what he saw outside the window. This time, the two matched.
The guidance instrument helps the crew determine which way the spacecraft is pointing. That matters when they need to set the spacecraft on course for its return to Earth. But for most of the flight, McDivitt couldn’t check whether the instrument was reliable. He had to rely on it without knowing whether it was accurate.
McDivitt described the problem at a postflight briefing attended by fellow astronaut Edward White. He explained that he hadn’t had enough time to use the instrument and compare its reading with what he saw through the window. For most of the mission, then, he didn’t know whether he could trust its reading.
He also hadn’t been able to properly align and check the instrument at the start of the flight. As far as he was concerned, it remained an open question. Only on the third day did the astronauts manage to switch it on and compare its reading with the view outside.
McDivitt compared the instrument’s reading with the spacecraft’s appearance outside the window. The directions matched. At last, he had a reason to trust the instrument. He said that by the time they were ready to return, he felt confident in it.
White agreed with McDivitt’s account. The two also said they’d lost several bets about the instrument. They didn’t say what they had bet on, but the wagers suggest that even among the astronauts, its accuracy had been an open question.
The passage doesn’t specify exactly what the astronauts saw outside the window. It describes only the comparison between the instrument’s reading and the view, and notes that the directions matched.
For most of the flight, they had no answer. Then the window and the instrument finally pointed in the same direction. And when you’re on your way back to Earth, how much is a moment like that worth?