A New Research Year, but Payment Still Hinged on Budget Approval
The research contract with Bigelow moved into another year, but payment depended on budget approval.
The research contract with Bigelow moved into another year, but payment depended on budget approval.
The research contract with Bigelow moved into another year, but payment depended on budget approval. The document does not identify the 12 research areas or report any findings.
The document says they concerned possible threats from the air but does not specify the areas.
The document makes payment contingent on budget approval and notification to the company, but does not say whether the funds were approved later.
A U.S. contract dated September 2009 extended work with Bigelow Aerospace. The company was studying potential future threats from the air, and the contract gave it the option to continue for another year.
But the extension came with a catch: the document activated the additional contract year while making payment contingent on budget approval. In other words, the contract moved forward on paper, but the government made no commitment to pay until the funds were approved.
The U.S. Department of Defense administered the contract with Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies. In September, it extended the existing work period through the end of that month and set an additional period, from October 2009 through the end of September 2010.
The document says the first option year was exercised. But it also stipulates that the government would pay only if funds were allocated for the work, and only after the company was notified that they were available. Exercising the option did not mean the money had already arrived.
The research program covered 12 technical areas related to possible future threats from the air. The document does not name those areas, so it does not reveal which specific questions researchers were asked to examine.
The contract required the company to submit monthly status reports, work-management plans, and research reports. These were part of an organized work plan, but the document concerns the contract and payment, not the research findings.
The document does not say what the researchers found or whether the budget was approved later. It states that payment depended on funding approval and notification to the company.
A full year was added to the contract. Did work in the lab continue for that year, too? The document doesn’t say.