Government Commissioned a 12-Area Aerospace Study for Nearly $22 Million
The contract called for reports and research plans, as well as a broad assessment of potential hazards.
The contract called for reports and research plans, as well as a broad assessment of potential hazards.
In 2008, the U.S. government commissioned a study of potential hazards in aviation and aerospace. The contract covered 12 research areas, reports, and plans, but did not name the areas or describe the findings.
Prepare work plans and reports on 12 research areas, provide monthly updates, and submit an overall assessment of potential hazards.
The document refers to 12 areas but does not name them.
The document does not describe the findings or what was done with them. Parts of it were redacted.
On September 22, 2008, a U.S. government representative signed a contract with a private company in Washington for nearly $22 million.
The company was to study potential hazards in aviation and aerospace. The contract called for work plans and reports covering 12 research areas, along with monthly progress reports. It also required a broad assessment of the hazards as a whole. But the document describes what was commissioned, not what the study found.
The contract went to Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies. It called for work plans for each of the 12 research areas, as well as research reports. The company was also to submit monthly progress updates.
The subjects concerned potential hazards in aviation and aerospace over a period of more than 40 years. The contract therefore covered not just a single hazard, but a range of topics over an extended period.
Alongside reports on each area, the contract called for an overall assessment of potential hazards. The company was asked to prepare a wide-ranging document examining the different subjects as part of a single picture.
The contract divided the work into an initial period and additional years. It allocated funds for reports, research plans, travel, and other expenses. The total came to nearly $22 million. The sum was tied to a clear list of tasks, not a description of findings.
The document does not name the 12 research areas or say what the study found or which hazards were identified. It also does not explain what was done with the results; parts of it were redacted. The source describes the contract as an administrative record of the work commissioned, not a final research report.
The picture is clear: a list of tasks, a large sum, and questions the document does not answer.