They were tracking a balloon when they spotted metallic discs, too. Years later, the Air Force still couldn’t explain what they were.
Weather Service workers in Richmond saw metallic discs beside a balloon, months before newspapers began reporting flying saucers. An Air Force study examined about 210 reports but couldn’t identify the objects.
They observed through an optical instrument called a theodolite, used for precise aiming and observation. They saw both the weather balloon and the objects through it.
The study describes metallic discs. It gives no details about their size, movement, or distance.
No. Researchers raised the Soviet Union as a possible foreign source, but they didn’t identify any particular aircraft or present evidence.
In April 1947, Weather Service workers in Richmond, Virginia, tracked a balloon in the sky. Through an optical instrument used for precise observation, they also saw metallic discs.
One worker saw them on three occasions; another saw a similar object once. The sightings came months before reports of flying saucers appeared in U.S. newspapers. That was one reason researchers concluded that not all the reports could be attributed to newspaper coverage. But even after reviewing hundreds of accounts, they couldn’t identify the objects.
The workers tracked weather balloons as part of their jobs. In all four Richmond sightings, both the balloon and the unidentified objects were seen through the same instrument. Researchers took this as evidence that the sightings predated the influence of newspaper reports.
The study considered about 210 reports of objects in the sky. The witnesses included experienced weather observers, pilots, and technical workers. Researchers wrote that the witnesses’ credibility, along with similarities among some of their accounts, supported the conclusion that people had seen something. But that wasn’t enough to determine what it was.
The study proposed several possibilities: weather balloons, rockets, experimental aircraft, or atmospheric phenomena. Researchers also raised the possibility that the objects came from another country. If so, they thought, investigators should consider whether they originated in the Soviet Union, which then included Russia.
That possibility wasn’t based on identifying any particular aircraft. It stemmed from concern that, if the objects were foreign, they might be connected to Soviet scientific, military, or intelligence activity. Researchers therefore wanted to determine whether they had a domestic origin before treating them as a foreign threat.
The 1949 study couldn’t determine what the objects were or where they came from. The account of the Richmond sightings says the witnesses saw metallic discs, but gives no details about their size, movement, or distance.
The balloon was identified: the workers were tracking it as part of their jobs. The discs, seen through the same instrument, remained unexplained. Even today, the brief account leaves the question open: What exactly passed through the sky beside the weather balloon?