Military Aircrew Member Tracks Object Flying in the Opposite Direction
He tried to get a closer shot, but lost sight of the object.
He tried to get a closer shot, but lost sight of the object.
A military crew member saw a small object moving quickly in the opposite direction from the aircraft. When he tried to get a closer shot, the object left the camera’s field of view and could not be found again.
The report notes that a video was attached, but does not describe what it shows. So the available information does not establish whether the object appears in the footage.
No. The crew member and other experienced people could not identify it, and the report offers no explanation.
In the eastern United States, a military crew member spotted a small object below the aircraft. It was moving quickly in a straight line, in the opposite direction.
He tracked it for several seconds, then turned on a recording device to capture it. As he zoomed in, the object left the frame and disappeared. Even the experienced people with him could not identify what they had seen.
The incident took place in 2019, during a military aircraft operation. The crew member described a small object moving below the aircraft and in the opposite direction. He estimated that it was traveling at high speed.
He tracked it for about 10 to 15 seconds, then turned on the recording device to film it. The report notes that a video was attached, but does not say what it shows.
The crew member zoomed in, trying to get a clearer shot. The object then left the field of view—the area the camera can see. He zoomed back out but could not find it again.
After the flight, the object looked rectangular to him. Other people who were as experienced as he was, or more so, could not say what it was either. That is how the crew member described the incident in his report.
The report recounts an attempt to record the object, but does not say what the video itself shows. So the record does not establish whether the footage clearly captures the object or whether its shape can be identified. The description of a rectangular object appears separately: the crew member wrote that this was how it looked to him when he reviewed the incident after the flight.
The object’s identity is unknown, as is the explanation for the speed and movement described. The report offers no conventional explanation and makes clear that the account reflects the reporter’s personal impression; it does not establish the object’s characteristics.
The picture remains incomplete: a small object leaves the camera’s field of view, and the camera never finds it again.