Military Report From the Strait of Hormuz Doesn’t Say What Crew Member Saw
A service member reported seeing something unidentified. The released record leaves it undescribed.
A service member reported seeing something unidentified. The released record leaves it undescribed.
A military crew member reported seeing something unidentified in the Strait of Hormuz. The released report doesn’t describe it, and parts of the record are redacted.
USCENTCOM MISREP 4871281 documenting an Air Force ISR sortie on 1-2 October 2020 over the Arabian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf of Oman in support of NAVCENT. The aircraft (callsign and type redacted under exemption 1.4a) launched from OKAS at 012249Z OCT20, was on station from 012300Z to 021922Z, and at 1829Z observed 1x UAP (referenced as Observation Line 1, the contents of which do not appear in the released text). The mission also logged five guard calls, observed an ATR 72-500 and other aircraft at Abu Musa Island Airfield, and a possible NASER WAP at the Bushehr IRIN boatyard. Released under USCENTCOM MDR 26-0028 to AARO; declassification date 2045-03-01.
Aircraft (type and callsign redacted) observed 1x UAP at 1829Z. Detail referenced as 'Observation Line 1'; the Observation section content is not present in the released/OCR'd text.
Observed 1x unidentified aircraft on runway at Abu Musa Island Airfield.
Observed 1x unidentified aircraft at Abu Musa Island Airfield assessed to be an ATR 72-500.
Observed 1x possible NASER WAP docked in vicinity of Bushehr IRIN boatyard.
"AT 1829Z, [REDACTED 1.4a] OBSERVED 1X UAP, SEE OBSERVATION LINE 1."
Why it matters: The single UAP observation event in the Narrative; the referenced Observation Line 1 detail block is not present in the released document text.
Page 1
"SUPPORTED NAVCENT FOR OPERATION [REDACTED] IVO ARABIAN GULF, STRAIT OF HORMUZ AND GULF OF OMAN."
Why it matters: Establishes the AOR and supported component.
Page 1
"FROM 0117Z TO 1835Z, [REDACTED 1.4a] CONDUCTED SCANS IAW THE TARGET DECK IN THE ARABIAN GULF (AG)."
Why it matters: Defines on-station ISR window during which the UAP was observed.
Page 5
"(U) HEAVY HAZE PRECLUDED IMINT ANALYSIS"
Why it matters: Weather caveat that may bear on sensor interpretation of any imagery collected during the UAP event.
Page 5
"21 MISSION HOURS, 17.3 IMINT HOURS, 1 IMINT TASKING PROSECUTED, 15.3 [REDACTED 1.4a] HOURS. 3 [REDACTED 1.4a] TASKING PROSECUTED, 4 TOTAL TASKINGS PROSECUTED."
Why it matters: Mission accounting summary.
Page 1
MG Richard A. Harrison
USCENTCOM Chief of Staff (declassification authority) · USCENTCOM · Page 1
Arabian Gulf
Page 1
Strait of Hormuz
Page 1
Gulf of Oman
Page 1
OKAS (takeoff/landing ICAO), Saudi Arabia
Page 4
Abu Musa Island Airfield, Iran (disputed)
Page 5
Bushehr IRIN Boatyard, Iran
Page 5
482 ATKS
U.S. Air Force · Page 1
432 ABW
U.S. Air Force · Page 2
609 CAOC / 609 AOC ISRD
U.S. Air Force · Page 2
NAVCENT
U.S. Navy · Page 1
AFCENT (MAJCOM)
U.S. Air Force · Page 1
USCENTCOM (COCOM)
Joint · Page 1
DGS-1 (FMV exploitation)
U.S. Air Force · Page 1
Aircraft callsign throughout Narrative
Likely reason: Exemption 1.4a (national defense / military plans)
Operation name ('OPERATION ____')
Likely reason: Exemption 1.4a
Asset Type / Aircraft type and tail numbers (Takeoff block)
Likely reason: Exemptions 1.4a and (b)(4) / b(6)
POC, INGEST and APPROVER full names, phone, email
Likely reason: Exemption 3.5c / (b)(6) PII
Tasked Start Point MGRS-style grid digits
Likely reason: Exemption 1.4a
Aircraft Callsign and Ground Station Callsign in each Guardcall block (5 instances)
Likely reason: Exemptions 1.4a / 1.4g
Hailing party identity in Guardcall Gentext fields
Likely reason: Exemptions (b)(1) 1.4a, (b)(1) 1.4g
Observation Line 1 detail block referenced from Narrative not present in released text
Likely reason: Likely page or section omitted from release
MISREP 4871281, sortie 01-02 OCT 2020. Takeoff OKAS 012249Z, on station 012300Z, ISR window 020117Z-021835Z, RTB 021835Z, landed OKAS 021953Z. Aircraft type redacted; primary sensor AN/DAS-4 (ANDAS4) targeting pod with AH-BS WARIO additional avionics; FMV exploited by DGS-1. Five guard calls logged with aircraft positions in MGRS 40R series grids (40RCP, 40RDP, 40RCQ) at FL180 / FL160 — none associated with the UAP event itself. UAP observation cross-referenced as 'Observation Line 1' but the Observation block is not in the released text. Pair with DOW-UAP-D64 (slug 072) and other CENTCOM Gulf-region MISREPs from late 2020.
The released summary doesn’t describe what was seen, so the object can’t be identified from the record.
The source gives the date the record was released but doesn’t explain why it was released then.
ANDAS4 (AN/DAS-4 targeting pod, primary sensor)
sensor · Page 5
AH-BS WARIO (additional avionics)
sensor · Page 3
AH/GMESH (sensors available)
sensor · Page 5
ATR 72-500 (observed at Abu Musa)
aircraft · Page 5
Possible NASER WAP (observed at Bushehr boatyard)
ship · Page 5
During a military mission in the Strait of Hormuz in October 2020, a service member reported seeing something they couldn’t identify. The mission record became public only years later.
The record confirms a sighting but doesn’t describe what was seen. Parts of it are redacted, too. So what can we learn from it, and what remains hidden?
The record is a mission report, a form the U.S. military uses to document what happens during its operations. In this case, it confirms that a service member reported seeing something unidentified in the Strait of Hormuz.
But it doesn’t say what the object looked like or what it did. There’s no information about its color, shape, or movement. Those details aren’t merely missing from the published account: the official summary contains no description at all.
The U.S. Department of War released the record to the public in May 2026. The source doesn’t explain why it was released then. It also doesn’t say what the redacted sections contained, so it’s impossible to know whether they might have added information about the sighting.
The report does make clear the limits of the account. According to the summary, the descriptions and assessments in the record reflect the personal interpretation of the person reporting at the time of the event. In other words, they don’t prove that the object had particular characteristics or special capabilities.
We don’t know what the crew member saw, how long the sighting lasted, or what caused it. The summary offers no conventional explanation, but it also doesn’t provide enough detail to identify the object.
The record documents the sighting but not what was seen. What did the crew member see beyond the strait?