Two Objects Accelerated and Turned South, Witnessed by Military Operator
The operator estimated their speed at approximately 500 km/h. Then they changed direction.
The operator estimated their speed at approximately 500 km/h. Then they changed direction.
A US military operator reported two objects that accelerated and turned south. Their speed was estimated at approximately 500 km/h.
Heavily redacted U.S. military Mission Report (MISREP) GENTEXT section documenting two separate UAP observations. The first records 1 UAP observed at 1354Z at MGRS 34SCE7566990098, traveling at 40 knots between FL160 and FL170 with constant speed. The second records 2 possible UAPs observed at 2243Z at MGRS 35TQK1580995057, estimated at 278 knots, which increased speed and changed direction towards the south. Observer identities, dates, and most contextual information are redacted under classification marking 1.4(a).
1x UAP observed at FL160 to FL170, velocity 40 knots, speed remained constant
2x possible UAPs observed, velocity estimated at 278 knots; UAPs increased speed and changed direction towards the south
"AT 1354Z, 1.4(a)OBSERVED 1X UAP IVO 34SCE7566990098. VELOCITY WAS 40 KNOTS AT FL160 TO FL170. UAP SPEED REMAINED CONSTANT."
Why it matters: First reported observation: single UAP at constant low speed between FL160-FL170.
Page 5
"AT 2243Z, 1.4(a) OBSERVED 2X POSS UAPS IVO 35TQK1580995057. VELOCITY WAS ESTIMATED AT 278 KNOTS. UAPS INCREASED SPEED AND CHANGED DIRECTION TOWARDS THE SOUTH."
Why it matters: Second observation: two UAPs accelerating and maneuvering southward.
Page 6
MGRS 34SCE7566990098
Page 5
MGRS 35TQK1580995057
Page 6
Arabian Gulf, N/A
Entire page redacted
Likely reason: 1.4(a) — classification (military plans, weapons systems, operations)
Page blank/redacted in extracted text
Likely reason: Likely redacted under 1.4(a)
Page blank/redacted in extracted text
Likely reason: Likely redacted under 1.4(a)
Page blank/redacted in extracted text
Likely reason: Likely redacted under 1.4(a)
Observer identity preceding 'OBSERVED 1X UAP' redacted under 1.4(a); additional 1.4(a) redactions surround the GENTEXT entry
Likely reason: 1.4(a) — classification (military plans, weapons systems, operations)
Observer identity preceding 'OBSERVED 2X POSS UAPS' redacted under 1.4(a); '(b) (6)' redaction also present
Likely reason: 1.4(a) classification; (b)(6) FOIA personal privacy exemption
Document is a USCENTCOM-style MISREP GENTEXT excerpt with most content redacted under 1.4(a). Only the two UAP observation entries are legible. Title indicates 'Arabian Gulf, 2020' but manifest lists incident_location as 'Mediterranean Sea' — note this discrepancy. MGRS grids 34SCE and 35TQK fall within the CENTCOM AOR (broadly the Middle East region) consistent with 'Arabian Gulf' framing. Part of D4/D5/D6/D7 MISREP series (slugs 053, 058, 067, 074).
The record contains inconsistent location details, and the date of the event is not specified. Therefore, it is impossible to determine when and where it occurred.
No. This was the operator's estimate, and the document does not present it as a definitive measurement.
A US military operator observed two objects they could not identify. Their report stated that the objects were moving at an estimated speed of about 500 km/h, then accelerated and turned south.
This is the entire sequence described in the event: two objects, acceleration, and a turn. The report offers no explanation for what the operator saw, nor does it describe what happened after the objects turned. This brief movement is, in fact, the core of the report.
The event was documented in a military report, a form used to record incidents during operations. The operator wrote that they saw two possible unidentified objects. They estimated their speed at approximately 500 km/h, and subsequently described them accelerating and turning south.
The document does not explain how this estimate was determined, or what exactly led the operator to believe the objects accelerated. It also does not describe their shape. Therefore, this brief description cannot be turned into a full picture of what transpired.
The report details two clear stages: the objects accelerated and changed direction southward. It contains no further specifics on the duration of the movement, the distance covered, or the reaction of other individuals. Additional technical details in the record also do not add to the story of this movement.
The document itself includes redacted sections. But the visible description retains a moment that is easy to imagine: two objects moving, accelerating, and then turning south. There is no continuation explaining where they went.
It is unknown what the objects were, if the speed estimate was accurate, or what caused them to turn. The document emphasizes that the description and estimates reflect the operator's impression at the time of the event and do not prove what the objects were or what they were capable of doing.
Two objects turn south. Beyond that moment, the report stops.