A Physicist Asked for a Recipe to Simulate an Atomic Explosion
James Tuck’s request began with a book about large atmospheric vortices.
James Tuck’s request began with a book about large atmospheric vortices.
After reading about large atmospheric vortices in a book, James Tuck asked for instructions on simulating atomic explosions.
A set of personal letters to and from James L. Tuck, a Los Alamos-affiliated physicist, documenting his 1970s interest in unidentified anomalous phenomena and related physics. In one letter Tuck requests from the U.S. Army Engineer School at Fort Belvoir the recipe used for simulated atomic-bomb demonstrations, citing an interest in large atmospheric vortices reported in Edward U. Condon's 'Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects.' Another letter forwards commentary on ball lightning and references James M. McCampbell's 1976 book 'UFOLOGY,' tying its chapter on flight and propulsion to Einstein's pursuit of a unified field theory. The first two pages are largely illegible handwritten OCR.
"I would like to have the recipe that was used for the simulated atomic bomb [demonst]rations. We are interested in the large atmospheric vortices which are produced as reported in the book 'Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects' by Dr. Edward U. Condon."
Speaker: James L. Tuck
Why it matters: A Los Alamos physicist links simulated atomic-bomb test effects to large atmospheric vortices discussed in the Condon Report.
Page 3
"Mindful of your interesting report on ball lightning, I am enclosing comments on same by a UFO believer, James M. McCampbell, in his UFOLOGY, 1976, appearing on the new non-fiction shelf at the Mesa Library, call number 629.1338."
Why it matters: Connects ball lightning research to UFO literature.
Page 4
"His chapter FLIGHT AND PROPULSION strengthens my conviction that Einstein, while seemingly straying from the main current of physical research in his later years, was on scent like a bloodhound when he persisted in trying to lock in on a unified field theory."
Why it matters: Frames Einstein's unified field theory work as relevant to UFO propulsion speculation.
Page 4
James L. Tuck
physicist; correspondent · Los Alamos National Laboratory · Page 3
Edward U. Condon
author of 'Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects' · Page 3
James M. McCampbell
author of 'UFOLOGY' (1976) · Page 4
Einstein
Page 4
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060, USA
Page 3
Mesa Library
Page 4
Addressee name and salutation of letter to the U.S. Army Engineer School, Fort Belvoir
Likely reason: (b)(6) personal privacy — recipient's name
Signature block at end of letter
Likely reason: (b)(6) personal privacy — signatory's name
OCR quality is poor; pages 1-2 are largely illegible handwritten material and were not transcribed. Pages 3-4 are typed and partially legible. Name 'James L. Tuck' inferred from manifest title and mangled signature OCR ('Jazu,e:, L. Tk').
No. He asked for instructions to simulate atomic explosions.
The letter doesn’t explain the connection or detail what the recipe involved.
James Tuck, a physicist associated with Los Alamos Laboratory, wrote a letter asking for a recipe for simulating an atomic explosion. He wasn’t asking to set one off. He wanted the instructions used to create a simulation.
His request grew out of an interest in large atmospheric vortices, or swirling currents of air. Tuck had read about them in a book on UFO research. A book about phenomena in the sky had led a physicist to ask how to simulate an atomic explosion.
In a letter written in the 1970s, Tuck referred to a conversation that had taken place earlier that day. Afterward, he asked for the recipe used to simulate atomic explosions. He said his interest was connected to large atmospheric vortices described in a book by Edward Condon.
The request is clear, but the connection between the two subjects is not. Tuck doesn’t explain what the recipe involved or how simulating an explosion might help explain swirling air currents. He simply links his interest in vortices to his request for a simulation. That’s all the letter says about why he asked.
Condon’s book examined the scientific study of unidentified flying objects. Tuck didn’t say that the vortices had actually been observed or that they were caused by an explosion. He referred to them as described in the book and said they were relevant to his interest.
The surviving correspondence also includes another letter, about a report on ball lightning, a phenomenon that appears as a ball of light. That letter mentions a different book about UFOs but doesn’t connect it to Tuck’s request. The account therefore centers on his request and the vortices he had read about.
It’s unclear whether Tuck received the recipe, what it contained, or whether the simulation helped him understand the vortices. Parts of the record are redacted, and it doesn’t explain the practical connection between simulating an explosion and air currents.
What remains on paper is an unusual request: a recipe for a simulation, prompted by vortices described in a book about UFOs.