Two People Described Red Lights. The FBI Drew Them
The illustration is based on two people’s account, but the document says nothing about what they saw beyond the lights.
The illustration is based on two people’s account, but the document says nothing about what they saw beyond the lights.
Two people described an incident in the western United States in 2026. The FBI created an illustration of several red lights based on their account, but the document does not say what the lights were or what caused them.
No. It was created based on descriptions from two people.
No. The document does not say what the lights were or what caused them.
In 2026, two people in the western United States described an incident they had witnessed firsthand. The FBI later created a digital illustration based on their account, showing several red lights.
The illustration is not a photograph. It is a visual aid meant to represent what the two people described. But the document that presents it says almost nothing about the incident itself, leaving an image with no explanation of what it shows.
The illustration is titled “Several Red Lights.” That is all the title tells us: the image shows red lights. The document gives no details about how many lights there were, what shape they were or where they appeared. It does not say whether they moved, how long they were visible or what was around them.
The two people provided firsthand accounts, meaning they had experienced the incident they described. The FBI used those accounts to create the illustration. It is identified as an artistic rendering: a visual representation based on a description, not a photographic record of the incident.
According to the document, the illustration was created in 2026 as a visual aid for an FBI initiative. In simple terms, it gives a visible form to the account provided by the two people. It adds no details that were not included in their description, and it does not explain what caused the lights.
The gap between the illustration and the limited information available is striking: there is an image of several red lights, but no detailed account of what happened. The illustration alone cannot tell us what the two people saw. It shows the incident as the FBI chose to depict their account, not as a photograph taken in real time.
The document does not explain exactly what happened, what the lights looked like or what caused them. It offers no ordinary explanation for the incident, either.
All that remains are two people, an illustration of red lights and a lot of blank space around them. What exactly did they see?