Operator Couldn’t Identify Dark Object in Government Image
The FBI sent the image for review, but parts were redacted and the mission report was missing.
The FBI sent the image for review, but parts were redacted and the mission report was missing.
A dark object appears in an image from a U.S. government system, but the operator couldn’t identify it. The FBI sent the report for review, though parts of the image were redacted and the mission report was missing.
A single monochrome still image submitted by the FBI to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) as part of a UAP report. The frame shows a uniform hazy/grainy field overlaid with a centered crosshair reticle bearing tick marks and a numeric tick label '5'. Multiple horizontal black redaction bars obscure portions of the top edge, sides, and bottom of the image. No date, location, or accompanying mission report was provided with the source record.
FBI submission to AARO of a still image derived from a U.S. government system; date and location not provided. Operator reported inability to positively identify the UAP. Original imagery was altered with redactions before submission to AARO.
Top edge of image: three horizontal black bars spanning roughly the full width, with small gaps between them.
Likely reason: Pre-submission redaction of overlay text/HUD elements (likely classification banner, system identifiers, or mission metadata).
Mid-left and mid-right of image: two pairs of horizontal black bars flanking the central reticle at upper-middle and lower-middle vertical positions.
Likely reason: Pre-submission redaction of HUD telemetry strings (likely coordinates, bearing/range, sensor identifiers).
Bottom edge of image: two horizontal black bars spanning portions of the lower border.
Likely reason: Pre-submission redaction of HUD footer text (likely timestamps, system identifiers, or classification markings).
Visual content is consistent with a sensor-feed still (centered reticle with tick-mark scale and a numeric '5' tick label) but the platform and sensor modality are not identified in the image because all overlay text has been redacted with black bars. No EXIF metadata is present (per data/media/113-fbi-photo-a8.json the exif object is empty). Image dimensions: 412x306 px, RGB PNG, 87292 bytes. The descriptive prose used in 'object_descriptions' is taken verbatim from the war.gov manifest narrative; the corresponding parent FBI case file is 62-HQ-83894.
The FBI forwarded the report to a U.S. office that investigates anomalous phenomena.
No. The operator couldn’t identify it, and the source offers no explanation.
A small, dark object appears in the black-and-white image, just below and to the right of the reticle’s center. The reticle is an aiming marker in the middle of the image.
The operator couldn’t identify the object. Even so, the image was submitted for review as part of a report about an unidentified anomalous phenomenon. Details that could help establish what was photographed, such as the location and mission report, are missing from the file.
Faint, winding patterns appear in the background. Near the center of the reticle is an irregularly shaped dark object. That’s all the image itself reveals; it offers no clue to the object’s identity.
The FBI reported that the operator couldn’t identify it with certainty. That’s the report’s central detail: an object appears in the image, but the person operating the system couldn’t say what they were seeing. The description provides no information about what else the operator did or saw.
The FBI forwarded the report to a U.S. office that investigates anomalous phenomena. It included a still image, a single frame taken from a U.S. government system. The image of an unidentified object thus became part of an official file.
But the image wasn’t provided in full. Parts of it were redacted before it was submitted for review. The mission report, which could have provided more information about the image, was also missing. Reviewers were left with a partial image and a brief description of what the operator could identify.
The location where the image was taken and other details about the incident weren’t provided, and the mission report was missing. The object’s identity is also unknown, and the source offers no conventional explanation for it.
The report ends with the image and the question the operator couldn’t answer: What appears beside the reticle?