During a military mission, round objects appeared on camera from time to time. When the operator returned to previously scanned points, the objects showed up again.
During a military mission in Iraq, an operator saw six round objects appear from time to time. When the operator returned the camera to previously scanned points, the objects appeared again, but their altitude and identity remained unknown.
The report does not identify them. It records the operator’s account but offers no explanation for what was seen.
No. According to the report, they did not interfere with the military mission.
During a military mission in Iraq, an operator scanned an area with a camera. Six round objects appeared together in the image from time to time.
The objects did not appear continuously. Still, when the operator moved the camera back to points already scanned, they showed up again. The report describes what the operator saw but does not establish what the objects were or how high they were moving.
The incident took place in 2022. According to the report, the operator scanned several points in the area over about an hour and 40 minutes. The objects appeared from time to time during the scan, both within the target area and in another part of it.
The report describes six small, round objects moving together. Their size was estimated at one to two meters, roughly the height of a person. That was the operator’s estimate, not a precise measurement.
During the sighting, the operator moved the camera back to points already checked. Each time, the objects appeared again. The report does not say how many times they appeared or how long each appearance lasted.
The report also says the objects moved at different speeds. The operator could not determine their altitude, so their path could not be described precisely. The objects did not interfere with the military mission.
The report notes that the sighting was recorded by an imaging system mounted on a military vehicle. It gives the operator’s account, not an independent identification of the objects. Dust storms affected some of the footage collected in the area.
The report does not identify the objects or explain why they looked the way they did. Dust storms affected some of the footage, but the report does not conclude that they explain the sighting.
The camera returned to previously scanned points. The objects appeared again, but the footage did not reveal what they were.