The Navy Asked Its Stations to Report Flying Saucers
A 1948 memo asked Navy stations to send reports to two military offices.
A 1948 memo asked Navy stations to send reports to two military offices.
A 1948 memo asked Navy stations to report flying-saucer incidents to the Air Force and a naval intelligence office.
A 1948 memorandum from the Commandant of the Fifth Naval District distributing and quoting a confidential letter from the Chief of Naval Operations on the subject of "Flying Discs." It relays that the Director of Intelligence, U.S. Air Force, has informed the Navy Department that a cycle of reappearance of "Flying Discs" is becoming apparent and that a new interval is imminent, and requests that sightings be reported quickly and investigated. It directs all stations to report any sighting of "Flying Discs" or other unidentified aerial objects to the nearest Air Force command and to the Naval District Intelligence Office, to obtain photographic evidence when possible, and to forward such information to the Chief of Naval Intelligence for transmission to the Air Force Director of Intelligence.
"The Director of Intelligence, U.S. Air Force has informed the Navy Department that a cycle of reappearance of "Flying Discs" is becoming apparent, and that the beginning of a new interval is imminent."
Why it matters: Official statement asserting a recurring cyclic pattern of 'Flying Disc' reappearances was being tracked by Air Force intelligence.
Page 2
"It is requested, therefore, that all stations be directed to report to the nearest Air Force command and to the Naval District Intelligence Office any reported sighting of "Flying Discs" or other unidentified aerial objects. It is desired, also, that photographic evidence of the phenomena be obtained whenever possible."
Why it matters: Formal Navy-wide reporting directive on UAP sightings, explicitly requesting photographic evidence.
Page 2
Commandant, Fifth Naval District
Originator of the memorandum · U.S. Navy · Page 2
Fifth Naval District
U.S. Navy · Page 2
OCR quality is poor; the header memorandum (page 2) is partially garbled but the quoted CNO directive text is legible. Document is dated 1948 per the slug/title; the reference letter date ('dtd November') is partially illegible in the OCR. Pages 1 and 3 are fragmentary file/records-stamp pages with no substantive content.
No. It asks the stations to report incidents but does not describe a specific sighting.
To the nearest Air Force command and the intelligence office of the naval district.
The source does not say whether any reports were sent or what followed the request.
A U.S. Navy district commander asked Navy stations to report incidents involving flying saucers. The request appears in a 1948 memo, not an account of an encounter in the sky.
The intriguing detail is not what anyone saw, but what the stations were told to do if an incident occurred. They were to send reports to two offices: the Air Force and a Navy intelligence office. The memo shows where the Navy wanted such information to go.
The commander asked the stations to send a report to the nearest Air Force command. They were also to forward it to the naval district’s intelligence office.
The instruction was straightforward: reports were not to stay at the stations where they were received. They were supposed to reach both an Air Force office and a Navy office. The memo does not say what either was expected to do with the information, so there is no reason to guess.
The memo was written by the commander of the Fifth Naval District. A naval district is an administrative area of the Navy, not a place where a particular incident took place. The request, then, does not describe an event in the district; it is addressed to Navy stations.
The memo also refers to an earlier document about flying saucers by a senior Navy official. That is all the source tells us about the earlier document: it gives no details about its contents or why the reports were requested. The memo itself is identified as U.S. Department of War material.
The memo does not explain why reports were requested at that particular time, whether the stations sent any, or what followed. It also gives no details about any incidents or what those involved saw.
What remains is a brief directive sending reports to two offices. What information was supposed to reach them? The memo doesn’t say.